Business call recording: consent laws by state, with a free lookup tool

November 3, 2026|11 minute read|The callflo.ai team

On this page

Hear it answer a call

Call callflo.ai's AI agent and ask it about your business.

(541) 802-5968
See plans and sign up

Business call recording is legal in every US state when you get the right consent. Federal law and most states require one party's consent. Ten states require everyone's, and three more are split or unsettled. A single notice at the start of the call is the simplest way to cover a caller from anywhere.

Call recording consent lookup

Pick your state and the caller's. You see the rule for each, the setting to use when they differ, the statute, and a disclosure line written for your greeting or your agent. We read each rule in November 2026, against the statute wherever we could open it.

Look up a call

Texas
One-party
California
All-party
Use this setting
All-party

Safe default: tell everyone and get their consent

The two states differ. Courts do not apply one uniform test for which state's law governs an interstate call, so California's stricter rule is the safe default.

Texas. Tex. Penal Code 16.02.

California. Cal. Penal Code 632, 632.7. Section 632 covers confidential calls. Section 632.7 covers cell and cordless calls whether confidential or not, and Smith v. LoanMe (Cal. 2021) applies it to the parties themselves. Kearney v. Salomon Smith Barney (Cal. 2006) applied California's rule to an out-of-state business recording calls with California clients.

Disclosure line to copy

Thanks for calling Oak Street Realty. This call is recorded and transcribed. By staying on the line, you agree to that. If you'd rather not be recorded, please hang up and contact us another way.

  • Start the recording before the notice plays, so the notice itself is on the recording.
  • Give the caller a real way to say no, and stop recording if they do.
  • Play the notice on outbound calls too. An inbound greeting does not cover a call you place.

Runs entirely in your browser: nothing is stored or sent. Rules checked November 2026. General information, not legal advice.

Key takeaways

  • 36 states and DC follow one-party consent for phone calls, but that does not protect you when the caller is in an all-party state.
  • All-party for phone calls: California, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania and Washington.
  • Split or unsettled, so treat as all-party: Connecticut, Delaware and Michigan.
  • You usually cannot tell where a caller is. A cell area code only says where the number was issued, so announce on every call.
RuleWhat it meansWhere
One-partyA party to the call may record, or anyone with one party's consent, without telling the other side.Federal law, 36 states and DC
All-partyEveryone on the call has to know or agree, depending on the state.CA, FL, IL, MD, MA, MT, NV, NH, PA, WA
Split or unsettledTwo statutes or court readings point different ways.CT, DE, MI
No state statute foundOnly the federal rule is left. Confirm with counsel.VT
Consent rules for phone calls, checked November 2026. General information, not legal advice.

What call recording for business involves

Call recording for business means keeping the audio of calls with customers, usually for training, disputes and notes. The recording is the easy part, since most phone systems do it with a setting. The legal work is consent, and the operational work is deciding who can listen and how long you keep it.

Say a tenant insists the office promised a Friday repair. With a recording, that takes two minutes to settle. Without one, you are comparing memories. That is the case for recording, and it is also why your recordings will hold things you would rather not store, such as health details and the occasional card number read aloud.

The federal rule on recording business calls

Federal law is one-party consent. Under 18 U.S.C. 2511(2)(d), a private person who is on the call, or who has one party's prior consent, may record it. The exception disappears if the purpose is a criminal or tortious act. States can set stricter rules, and that is where most business mistakes happen.

Which law applies when two states are on the call

No single test settles which state's law applies to an interstate call, so treat the stricter state as the safe default. A one-party office in Texas that records a caller in California should act as if California's rule applies.

That caution comes from a real case. In Kearney v. Salomon Smith Barney (Cal. 2006), the California Supreme Court applied California's all-party rule to a firm whose Atlanta office recorded calls with California clients, and it warned out-of-state businesses that the rule reaches them. Your own state's rule is not a shield.

Call recording laws by state

This table covers all 50 states, DC and the federal rule, for phone calls. In-person conversations can follow different rules, as Oregon and Nevada show. Links go to the statute, to the state's own site where it opened for us and otherwise to a public copy. Laws change, so click through before you rely on a row.

StatePhone call ruleStatuteNuance
FederalOne-party18 U.S.C. 2511(2)(d)One-party consent. A person who is a party to the call, or who has one party's prior consent, may record it, unless the purpose is a criminal or tortious act. States may set stricter rules.
AlabamaOne-partyAla. Code 13A-11-30, 13A-11-31No added nuance for a phone call.
AlaskaOne-partyAlaska Stat. 42.20.310No added nuance for a phone call.
ArizonaOne-partyA.R.S. 13-3005No added nuance for a phone call.
ArkansasOne-partyArk. Code 5-60-120No added nuance for a phone call.
CaliforniaAll-partyCal. Penal Code 632, 632.7Section 632 covers confidential calls. Section 632.7 covers cell and cordless calls whether confidential or not, and Smith v. LoanMe (Cal. 2021) applies it to the parties themselves. Kearney v. Salomon Smith Barney (Cal. 2006) applied California's rule to an out-of-state business recording calls with California clients.
ColoradoOne-partyC.R.S. 18-9-303No added nuance for a phone call.
ConnecticutSplit or unsettled, treat as all-partyConn. Gen. Stat. 52-570d, 53a-187, 53a-189Two rules. The criminal eavesdropping law is one-party. The civil statute for phone calls is stricter. The civil statute accepts prior written consent, consent recorded at the start of the call, a verbal notice recorded at the beginning, or an automatic tone about every 15 seconds.
DelawareSplit or unsettled, treat as all-party11 Del. C. 2402(c)(4), 1335(a)(4)The wiretap law allows one-party consent, while the privacy law says all parties. A federal court read the privacy law to let a party record (United States v. Vespe, 1975), but the two texts still conflict.
District of ColumbiaOne-partyD.C. Code 23-542(b)(3)No added nuance for a phone call.
FloridaAll-partyFla. Stat. 934.03(2)(d)No added nuance for a phone call.
GeorgiaOne-partyO.C.G.A. 16-11-66(a)Separate rules apply to recording a child under 18.
HawaiiOne-partyH.R.S. 803-42One-party for calls. Installing a recording device in a private place is a separate question and needs the consent of the people entitled to privacy there.
IdahoOne-partyIdaho Code 18-6702(2)(d)No added nuance for a phone call.
IllinoisAll-party720 ILCS 5/14-2, 5/14-3(j)The offense turns on recording a private conversation in a surreptitious manner, so an open notice matters. Section 14-3(j) has a narrow monitoring exemption for telephone solicitation and marketing or opinion research, with its own conditions.
IndianaOne-partyInd. Code 35-31.5-2-176No added nuance for a phone call.
IowaOne-partyIowa Code 808B.2No added nuance for a phone call.
KansasOne-partyK.S.A. 21-6101(a)(1)The statute speaks of the consent of the sender or receiver.
KentuckyOne-partyKRS 526.010No added nuance for a phone call.
LouisianaOne-partyLa. R.S. 15:1303No added nuance for a phone call.
MaineOne-party15 M.R.S. 709(4), 710No added nuance for a phone call.
MarylandAll-partyMd. Code, Cts. & Jud. Proc. 10-402(c)(3)No added nuance for a phone call.
MassachusettsAll-partyM.G.L. c. 272, s. 99The statute is built around secretly recording, by anyone without prior authority from all parties.
MichiganSplit or unsettled, treat as all-partyMCL 750.539cThe text says all parties. Sullivan v. Gray (Mich. Ct. App. 1982) held a participant is not an eavesdropper, but a software vendor recording for you may not count as a participant, and the Michigan Supreme Court has not settled it.
MinnesotaOne-partyMinn. Stat. 626A.02, subd. 2(d)No added nuance for a phone call.
MississippiOne-partyMiss. Code 41-29-531No added nuance for a phone call.
MissouriOne-partyMo. Rev. Stat. 542.402.2(3)No added nuance for a phone call.
MontanaAll-partyMont. Code 45-8-213The offense is recording with a hidden device without the knowledge of all parties. The statute exempts persons given warning of the recording, and says if one person provides the warning, either party may record.
NebraskaOne-partyNeb. Rev. Stat. 86-290No added nuance for a phone call.
NevadaAll-partyNRS 200.620, 200.650All-party for phone calls and one-party for in-person talks. NRS 200.620 pairs one party's consent with an emergency, and Lane v. Allstate (Nev. 1998) read that emergency path as mainly for law enforcement.
New HampshireAll-partyN.H. RSA 570-A:2Recording without all parties' consent is a felony. It drops to a misdemeanor if you are a party or have one party's consent.
New JerseyOne-partyN.J.S.A. 2A:156A-4(d)No added nuance for a phone call.
New MexicoOne-partyNMSA 30-12-1(C)The text names telegraph and telephone and asks for the consent of a sender or intended recipient. How it reaches cell calls is not settled.
New YorkOne-partyN.Y. Penal Law 250.00, 250.05No added nuance for a phone call.
North CarolinaOne-partyN.C.G.S. 15A-287(a)No added nuance for a phone call.
North DakotaOne-partyN.D.C.C. 12.1-15-02No added nuance for a phone call.
OhioOne-partyOhio R.C. 2933.52(B)(4)No added nuance for a phone call.
OklahomaOne-party13 O.S. 176.4No added nuance for a phone call.
OregonOne-partyORS 165.540(1)(a), (1)(c)One-party for phone calls. In-person conversations are different: everyone must be specifically informed, and the en banc Ninth Circuit upheld that rule in Project Veritas v. Schmidt (2025). This matters if you also record a front desk.
PennsylvaniaAll-party18 Pa.C.S. 5703, 5704(4)Commonwealth v. Byrd (Pa. 2020) found consent where a person heard a recording warning and kept talking, on facts from a jail visit.
Rhode IslandOne-partyR.I. Gen. Laws 11-35-21(c)(3)No added nuance for a phone call.
South CarolinaOne-partyS.C. Code 17-30-30(C)No added nuance for a phone call.
South DakotaOne-party. Confirm with counsel.SDCL 23A-35A-20We could not open the statute page itself, so this rests on the Reporters Committee guide, which cites it.
TennesseeOne-partyTenn. Code 39-13-601(b)(5)No added nuance for a phone call.
TexasOne-partyTex. Penal Code 16.02No added nuance for a phone call.
UtahOne-partyUtah Code 77-23a-4(7)(b)No added nuance for a phone call.
VermontNo state statute found. Confirm with counsel.No state recording statute found; 18 U.S.C. 2511The Reporters Committee guide found no Vermont statute on recording calls, which leaves the federal rule. Absence of a statute is hard to confirm, and privacy claims can still apply.
VirginiaOne-partyVa. Code 19.2-62(B)(2)No added nuance for a phone call.
WashingtonAll-partyRCW 9.73.030Consent counts as obtained once one party announces, in any reasonably effective manner, that the call is about to be recorded. The announcement itself must also be recorded.
West VirginiaOne-partyW. Va. Code 62-1D-3(e)No added nuance for a phone call.
WisconsinOne-partyWis. Stat. 968.31(2)(c), 885.365One-party to record, but Wis. Stat. 885.365 makes recorded calls inadmissible in civil cases unless an exception applies, such as telling the person the call is recorded and may be used in court.
WyomingOne-partyWyo. Stat. 7-3-702(b)(iv)No added nuance for a phone call.
All rows checked November 2026. South Dakota and Vermont rest on the Reporters Committee guide because we could not confirm them from a primary source. Scroll sideways on a phone.

We cross-checked each row against the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press recording guide, whose state pages were last updated between 2019 and 2025. On Oregon, the guide still describes a 2023 ruling that the en banc Ninth Circuit later replaced, so we went with the newer decision. Use the table as a place to start, and confirm your own situation with a local attorney.

The states where "one-party or two-party" is the wrong question

Most lists sort states into two bins. Several states do not fit, and in three of them the statute tells you exactly how to announce. Those details change what you put in the greeting, so they are worth more than the label.

Statutes that spell out the notice

  • Washington treats consent as obtained once you announce the recording, as long as the announcement is recorded too. RCW 9.73.030 is about as clear as these rules get.
  • Connecticut accepts a recorded verbal notice at the start or a tone about every 15 seconds under section 52-570d, even though its criminal law is one-party.
  • Montana exempts people given warning under section 45-8-213, and one warning lets either party record.

Statutes that pull against each other

  • Delaware has a one-party wiretap law and an all-party privacy law on the books at once.
  • Michigan has an all-parties text and a 1982 appeals decision letting a participant record. If software records for you, do not assume that decision covers it.
  • Nevada reads one-party at a glance. For phone calls, it is not.
  • Vermont has no recording statute that the Reporters Committee could find. That is not the same as permission, so ask counsel.

How to disclose call recording

Disclose recording in the first seconds of the call, in plain words, before anyone says anything you want to keep. Start the recording before the notice plays, so the notice is on the file. Give people a way to say no. The tool above writes the line, and these are the places it has to reach.

  • Inbound greeting. "This call is recorded" is firmer than "may be recorded" when it is true on every call.
  • Outbound calls. Your greeting never plays when you dial out, so a person or the agent has to say it.
  • Transfers and third parties. Anyone who joins mid-call missed the notice. Say it again.
  • Someone who objects. Decide now what happens, such as a callback on an unrecorded line, or a request by text.

If an AI answers, tell callers that too. The AI receptionist prompt guide covers how to word that in a greeting without sounding like a legal department wrote it.

Does call transcription need consent too?

Treat call transcription like recording. Transcription captures the words of the call, so the same notice should cover it, and the line should say both. Illinois names transcribing in its eavesdropping statute. A transcript is also easier to search and share than audio, which makes it more useful and more sensitive.

AI vendors add a newer question: is the software a party, or a third person listening in? In Ambriz v. Google, a California federal court in February 2025 let wiretap claims over a contact center AI product go forward, based on what the vendor could do with call data. Later rulings have muddied this, and it is unsettled. Ask your vendor whether it uses your calls for its own purposes, and get the answer in writing.

Two habits help whichever way that goes. Keep recordings only as long as you use them. And keep card numbers off the recording: have callers enter them on the keypad, as our guide to taking payments on a call explains.

What callflo.ai records and tells callers

callflo.ai logs each answered call with a summary and a transcript, and keeps a recording you can play back. callflo.ai is an AI receptionist for small business lines, so everything above applies to you if you use it.

We make no compliance promise, and our termsput the consent decision on the business that owns the line. In the agents set up through our newer mobile app, a recording notice is on by default and adds "This call is recorded." to the greeting. Elsewhere your greeting says what you set it to say, so check it against the tool above. To hear an AI greeting on a real line, call the number below, and see the pricing page for plans.

Hear how an AI greeting sounds

Call callflo.ai's own AI agent and ask it anything about your business. When you are ready, pick a plan: no setup fee, no contract, and you do not pay unless you are satisfied.

Starter is $39 a month on annual billing. Live on your line about 5 minutes after you sign up.

FAQ

Yes, with the right consent. Federal law and most states require the consent of one party, and ten states require everyone's for phone calls. This is general information, so confirm your situation with a local attorney.

California, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania and Washington, as of November 2026. Connecticut, Delaware and Michigan are split or unsettled, so the careful choice is to treat them the same way.

Treat the stricter rule as the safe default, because no single test settles which law applies. California's Supreme Court applied its all-party rule to an out-of-state firm recording California clients in Kearney v. Salomon Smith Barney.

In all-party states, yes in practice. In one-party states you may not have to, but you usually cannot tell where a caller is, so most businesses announce it on every call. A short line at the start of the call does it.

Say the call is recorded, and transcribed if it is, and give the caller a way to decline. For example: This call is recorded and transcribed. By staying on the line, you agree to that. Start recording before the notice plays so the notice is on the file.

Treat it the same way, and name both in your notice. Illinois names transcribing in its statute, and courts are still working out how wiretap laws apply to AI vendors that process calls.

Hear it answer before you decide

Call callflo.ai's own AI agent and ask it anything about your business. When you are ready, pick a plan: no setup fee, no contract, and you do not pay unless you are satisfied.

Call the AI agent: (541) 802-5968See plans and sign up

Starter is $39 a month on annual billing. Live on your line about 5 minutes after you sign up.

Keep reading

All of real estateCheap answering service: rank 16 plans on your own call volumeRead the postAll of real estateAnswering message service: what it is, and which kind you needRead the postAll of real estateAnswering service dispatch: build your on-call protocol in minutesRead the post